NEXTSCRIBE

Gofiber vs Echo for Building APIs in Go

Two Go web frameworks walk into a bar... who wins?

Here’s a list of 10 things I noticed while messing around with both Gofiber and Echo.

Spoiler alert they both good but also not the same vibe.


1. Speed and perf

Gofiber is freakin fast.
Like it’s built on top of fasthttp which is optimized like crazy. You’ll see better latency numbers if you’re into benchmarking stuff.
Echo’s fast too but not Gofiber fast. It’s using the standard net/http under the hood so yknow it’s more traditional.


2. Ease of use

Echo just feels comfy.
The APIs are super clear and not doing anything too weird. You can just sit down and write a REST API without googling too much.
Gofiber can feel a bit different if you’re used to standard Go http.


3. Middleware support

Both support middlewares.
But Echo got a richer ecosystem out the box.
Like you need JWT auth logging rate limiting whatever... Echo prob has a plug for that.
Gofiber has some too but it’s a bit more scattered and sometimes you end up writing your own stuff.


4. Request context

Echo uses Go’s standard context.Context which is great cause it’s what everything else in Go uses.
Gofiber has its own context thing which can be kinda annoying if you tryna pass values around or plug into something like gorm or whatever.


5. Routing

Both support route groups and params and all that jazz.
Gofiber routes are a bit more expressive I’d say. Like you can chain stuff nicely.
Echo’s routing is super solid though and very readable.


6. Error handling

Echo has a solid error handling system.
You can define custom error handlers and respond consistently.
Gofiber has it too but again feels a bit more manual sometimes.


7. Community and docs

Echo been around longer.
So more blog posts stackoverflow answers and all that.
Gofiber docs are nice too but community support is still catching up a bit.


8. Websocket support

Both have it.
Gofiber’s based on fasthttp so it does fine... but you need to be careful cause fasthttp doesn’t support full standard http features.
Echo works with Gorilla Websockets or whatever you like.


9. Deployment

No big diff here.
They both compile to a single binary and work great in Docker or whatever you use.
But since Gofiber is a bit faster you might get better resource usage in high traffic stuff.


10. Learning curve

Echo is just easier to grok if you already wrote stuff with net/http before.
Gofiber kinda does its own thing and takes a sec to get used to.


Bonus Point. Syntax Vibes

Some folks just like how code looks and feels.
Here’s a simple example of a basic API route in both to compare.

Gofiber

package main import "github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2" func main() { app := fiber.New() app.Get("/hello", func(c *fiber.Ctx) error { return c.SendString("Hello from Fiber") }) app.Listen(":3000") }

Echo

package main import ( "net/http" "github.com/labstack/echo/v4" ) func main() { e := echo.New() e.GET("/hello", func(c echo.Context) error { return c.String(http.StatusOK, "Hello from Echo") }) e.Start(":3000") }

Echo code feels more Go-ish.
Gofiber code feels snappy and clean but kinda not standard if you’re picky about that.


So which one should you use?

Gofiber
Use it if you care a lot about speed or building high perf microservices and you're ok with its custom style.

Echo
Use it if you want a super stable well documented easy to maintain API in pure Go style.

Honestly try both for a bit and see what feels better.
Your future self will thank you. Trust me.


That’s it.
Hope that helps.

Feel free to ping me if you wanna nerd out more on Go stuff.

Node vs Go for building APIs – No fluff, just real dev talk

Had this convo with a friend the other day. We were talking backend stuff and it came up, should you build your API in Node or in Go? Happens all the time. They both work, but they feel real different when you are the one doing the building.

So if you are stuck choosing or just trying to get the vibe of each, here is a straight up comparison. No marketing lingo, no sales pitch. Just how it really goes when you are building stuff.

Here are ten things that matter when you are picking between Node and Go for API work.

1. Getting started

Node
Quick to get going. Run a command, install express, write a few lines and boom you got an API. Great for hacking stuff together fast.

Go
Takes a little more setup. You make folders, write more code up front, think a bit about structure. Not hard, just slower to boot.

Verdict
Node wins here for speed. Go feels more clean but slower to kick off.

2. Concurrency and speed

Go
Built for handling a ton of stuff at once. Goroutines let you run functions side by side with almost no cost. You can handle a lot of traffic.

Node
Uses one thread with async calls. Works great for input and output stuff, but if you throw CPU work at it, things can get rough.

Verdict
Go takes this one for raw performance and traffic handling.

3. Typing

Node
JavaScript has no types. You can use TypeScript to get types, but that is an extra step.

Go
Always typed. You get errors before you run stuff. Helps a lot when your app grows.

Verdict
Go if you like your code to stay stable. Node if you want to move fast and maybe fix stuff later.

4. Error handling

Go
You will write a lot of if err is not nil. It is a little annoying but very clear. You always handle stuff up front.

Node
Use try and catch, or async and await. Feels nicer, but it is easy to forget things if you are not paying attention.

Verdict
Go is safer but wordy. Node is smooth but needs discipline.

5. Tools and setup

Go
Comes with what you need. Formatter, build tool, testing, it is all built in.

Node
You choose your own tools. Linter, formatter, test runner, all separate things. You spend time setting stuff up.

Verdict
Go keeps it simple. Node gives you more choice but more work too.

6. Libraries and packages

Node
The package world is huge. You want something? It probably exists. But you might have five versions of it and not know which one to trust.

Go
Fewer packages but usually solid. The quality is better on average but you will have less to pick from.

Verdict
Node for more options. Go for more stability.

7. Deployment

Go
Compile your app and you get one file. That is it. Upload it anywhere and it just works.

Node
Needs Node installed, maybe a process manager like PM2 or run it in a container. More moving parts.

Verdict
Go makes deployment easy. Node takes more steps.

8. Community

Node
Feels casual. A lot of frontend folks using it for backend now. Tons of help online.

Go
Feels more serious. Devops and backend engineers mostly. Still helpful, just a different energy.

Verdict
Node for a relaxed vibe. Go for focused and clean.

9. Scaling

Go
Made to scale. Light memory use, fast, good at handling many requests at once.

Node
Can scale, but needs more planning. You might need clusters or extra tools if traffic gets big.

Verdict
Go is better out of the box for scale.

10. Writing code

Node
Feels fast to write. Async and await make it readable. If you know JavaScript, you will be comfy right away.

Go
More rules, fewer surprises. At first it feels strict, but after a while you stop thinking about weird bugs.

Verdict
Node is flexible. Go is solid. Just depends on your style.


Quick code time, same API in both

Node using Express

const express = require('express') const app = express() app.get('/hello', (req, res) => { res.send('Hello from Node!') }) app.listen(3000, () => { console.log('Server running at http://localhost:3000') })

Go using standard library

package main import ( "fmt" "net/http" ) func helloHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { fmt.Fprint(w, "Hello from Go!") } func main() { http.HandleFunc("/hello", helloHandler) fmt.Println("Server running at http://localhost:3000") http.ListenAndServe(":3000", nil) }

So which one should you use

If you want to build fast, love JavaScript, and want a lot of tools at your fingertips, go with Node.

If you care about performance, want easy deployment, and do not mind being a little more strict, Go is a great choice.

No bad answer here. Just pick what fits you and your project.

Now go write some code.

Express vs Fastify: Which Node.js Framework Should You Actually Use?

Alright, so you’re building an API with Node.js and you're thinking, "Do I just go with Express like everyone else, or should I try out Fastify and see what the hype is about?"

Let’s break it down. I’ve used both, and they both work. But depending on your project, one might make your life way easier than the other.

Express

Express is the old reliable. It’s been around forever, and pretty much every Node developer has used it at some point. If you're looking for something stable with a massive ecosystem, Express is still a solid choice.

Pros

  • Huge community. If you run into an issue, someone on Stack Overflow already solved it five years ago.
  • Tons of middleware. You need something? There’s probably a package for it.
  • Very flexible. It doesn’t force structure or conventions on you.

Cons

  • Not the fastest, performance wise.
  • Some parts feel a little dated if you’re used to more modern frameworks.
  • Lacks builtin support for things like input validation or automatic API docs.

Express example

// express-server.js const express = require('express'); const app = express(); app.use(express.json()); app.get('/', (req, res) => { res.send('Hello from Express'); }); app.listen(3000, () => { console.log('Express app running on http://localhost:3000'); });

Easy to understand, works everywhere, no surprises.

Fastify

Fastify is newer, but it's built for performance. If you're starting something fresh and want the benefits of modern architecture, Fastify's got you covered. It's fast, lightweight, and actually pretty nice to work with once you get the hang of it.

Pros

  • Way faster than Express in most benchmarks.
  • Builtin schema validation using JSON Schema.
  • First class TypeScript support.
  • Automatic Swagger docs if you want them.

Cons

  • Smaller ecosystem. Not every Express middleware has a Fastify version.
  • A bit of a learning curve if you're used to Express's "do whatever you want" style.
  • Some plugins are still catching up in maturity.

Fastify example

// fastify-server.js const fastify = require('fastify')({ logger: true }); fastify.get('/', async (request, reply) => { return { msg: 'Hello from Fastify' }; }); fastify.listen({ port: 3000 }, (err, address) => { if (err) { fastify.log.error(err); process.exit(1); } fastify.log.info(`Fastify app running at ${address}`); });

Feels modern, right? You even get nice JSON logs without having to install anything extra.

So, Which One Should You Use?

Here’s the quick rundown.

Go with Express if:

  • You just want to build something quick.
  • You or your team already know it well.
  • You don’t care too much about performance and just want it to work.

Go with Fastify if:

  • You’re starting fresh and want modern features.
  • Performance actually matters for your use case.
  • You want structured request validation and automatic docs without cobbling together a bunch of packages.

Final Thoughts

Use the right tool for the job. Express is still good, but Fastify is making strong moves. If you're not stuck with legacy code or team constraints, Fastify feels like the better long-term play.

Either way, just build cool stuff.

The Best Tools for Upvoting (and Why Upvoted Should Be Your First Stop)

Let’s talk feature upvoting. You’ve got feedback flying in from every direction. Emails, Slack, Twitter DMs, random Notion docs... it's a mess. What you actually need is a clean, simple way to gather ideas, let your users vote on what they care about, and actually ship stuff people want. That is where upvoting tools come in.

Here’s a breakdown of the best options out there. We’re starting with Upvoted because it deserves that top spot.


1. Upvoted: The Feedback Board That Doesn’t Suck

Obviously I’m a little biased here, but seriously. Upvoted is not just another voting board. It is built to be useful for real teams and real users. You can spin up public or private boards in seconds, drop a widget anywhere on your site, and just like that, you're collecting feedback that actually means something.

What makes it great:

  • You collect smart feedback. Users can upvote, comment, and request features all in one spot.
  • You build with purpose. Turn feedback into a visual roadmap that tracks progress from "proposed" to "published."
  • You choose your visibility. Go public to get the community involved or stay private for internal team planning.
  • You embed it anywhere. One line of code and you are good to go. No hassle, no dev time wasted.
  • You keep everyone aligned. From stakeholders to engineers, everyone stays in the loop.

Pricing options:

  • Standard plan is $15.20 per month
  • Lifetime deal is $232 one-time. No recurring fees, ever.

If spreadsheets are your current "feedback system," trust me, it’s time for an upgrade.

Subscribe now: Upvoted


2. Canny: The OG With Enterprise Vibes

Canny has been around for a while and it shows. It is polished, feature-packed, and integrates with all the big tools. Enterprise teams love it, but it can feel like overkill if you are running a lean operation.

Pros:

  • It integrates with tools like Intercom, Slack, and Jira
  • Great choice for larger teams with big budgets

Cons:

  • Gets expensive fast if you scale up
  • Less flexibility for doing things your own way

3. Nolt: Super Clean and Straightforward

Nolt is a go-to for indie makers and small startups. It is simple and it works. No fluff.

Why people love it:

  • Setup is ridiculously fast
  • Public roadmaps look sleek and polished

Limitations to keep in mind:

  • Workflow options are limited
  • Private boards are locked behind higher tiers

4. Sleekplan: Feedback, Surveys, and Changelog All in One

Sleekplan goes beyond just upvoting. It adds surveys, changelogs, and a bunch of other feedback tools. It is like a Swiss Army knife for product teams.

Good for:

  • Teams that want a complete feedback suite
  • Creating a full feedback loop, from suggestion to release

Not so good for:

  • Simple needs. If you only want upvotes and a roadmap, it might be overkill
  • The interface takes a bit of getting used to

If you want a modern, clean, and user-friendly way to collect feedback, prioritize features, and build a roadmap that people actually follow, go with Upvoted. It is straightforward, flexible, and priced in a way that makes sense.

Give it a try. Launch a board, share it with your users, and start making data-backed product decisions right away.

Rails vs Phoenix: Which Framework Should You Choose in 2025?

Hey there, fellow developers!

Today I want to talk about two popular web frameworks that continue to make waves in the development world: Ruby on Rails and Phoenix. If you're trying to decide between these two for your next project, this comparison might help you make that choice.

The Contenders

Ruby on Rails has been around since 2004 and revolutionized web development with its "convention over configuration" philosophy. It's built on Ruby and has matured into a stable, feature-rich framework with a massive community.

Phoenix is the newer kid on the block, built on Elixir (which runs on the Erlang VM). It first appeared in 2014 and has been gaining traction for its performance and scalability benefits.

Development Speed and Productivity

Rails is famous for getting projects off the ground quickly. Its generator commands, built-in testing, and vast library of gems mean you can set up a full-featured app in no time.

# Creating a new Rails app with a database and scaffolding rails new my_blog cd my_blog rails generate scaffold Post title:string content:text rails db:migrate

Phoenix also values developer productivity but has a slightly steeper learning curve if you're new to functional programming. That said, once you're comfortable with Elixir, Phoenix's generators are just as powerful.

# Creating a new Phoenix app with database support mix phx.new my_blog cd my_blog mix phx.gen.html Content Post posts title:string content:text mix ecto.migrate

Performance

This is where things get interesting:

Rails is plenty fast for most applications, but it's not known for raw performance. Ruby is an interpreted language, and while it's gotten faster over the years, it's not winning any speed competitions.

Phoenix absolutely shines here. Built on the Erlang VM, Phoenix can handle an enormous number of concurrent connections with minimal resources. Real-world benchmarks often show Phoenix handling 5-10x more requests per second than Rails on the same hardware.

Scalability

Rails scales horizontally well enough (adding more servers), but vertical scaling (adding more to one server) hits limits due to Ruby's concurrency model.

Phoenix/Elixir was built for distribution and fault tolerance. The Erlang VM was designed by telecom engineers who needed systems that never go down, even during upgrades. Phoenix inherits this robustness and can effortlessly spread across multiple cores and machines.

Real-time Features

Rails added ActionCable for WebSockets support, which works well for moderate real-time needs, but it's not Rails' strongest feature.

Phoenix has Channels, a robust real-time communication layer that's a core part of the framework rather than an add-on. Phoenix is famous for its benchmark where they handled 2 million WebSocket connections on a single (beefy) server.

Community and Ecosystem

Rails has a massive community with thousands of gems (libraries) for almost anything you could want. It's supported by major companies and has been battle-tested for nearly two decades.

Phoenix has a smaller but rapidly growing community. The ecosystem doesn't have the same breadth as Rails yet, but the quality of the libraries tends to be high.

Learning Curve

Rails is fairly easy to pick up, especially if you already know Ruby. Its conventions make sense once you understand them, and there are tons of tutorials available.

Phoenix requires learning Elixir first, which is a functional language. If you're coming from object-oriented programming, this shift in thinking can take time to adjust to. However, Elixir is known for its excellent documentation and friendly syntax.

Jobs and Market Demand

Rails still has a strong job market, especially in startups and established companies that adopted it during its heyday.

Phoenix jobs are fewer but growing. Companies that need high concurrency or real-time features are increasingly turning to Elixir and Phoenix.

Which Should You Choose?

Here's my take:

Choose Rails if:

  • You need to build something quickly with a proven stack
  • Your app has standard web app requirements
  • You want easy hiring and a huge ecosystem of libraries
  • You're already familiar with Ruby or similar OOP languages

Choose Phoenix if:

  • Your app needs to handle high concurrency
  • Real-time features are central to your application
  • You're interested in functional programming
  • You're building something that needs high reliability or fault tolerance

My Two Cents

Both frameworks are awesome in their own ways. Rails continues to evolve and remains a highly productive choice for web development. Phoenix represents where web development is heading, with built-in support for the real-time, highly-concurrent apps that are increasingly in demand.

In 2025, I think Rails is still the safer choice for most standard web applications, but Phoenix is the better technical choice for applications that need to scale massively or have significant real-time components.